NM: Conflict of laws: NM exclusionary rule applies to TX search

Conflict of laws: “The New Mexico exclusionary rule is grounded in effectuating the constitutional rights of individuals and is therefore applicable where out-of-state evidence is introduced in a New Mexico court.” Here, it was a search in Texas that resulted in a murder charge in New Mexico. State v. Causey, 2026 N.M. LEXIS 124 (July 8, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Conflict of laws, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on NM: Conflict of laws: NM exclusionary rule applies to TX search

D.N.M.: Obtaining def’s juvenile records by subpoena is not a “search”; no REP

The government’s subpoena for defendant’s juvenile case records is granted. The government can show relevance and admissibility at trial. Defendant focuses on his Fourth Amendment claim which is rejected. No case says there is a reasonable expectation of privacy against disclosure in juvenile records. Therefore, disclosure is not a “search.” United States v. Silva, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149439 (D.N.M. July 7, 2026).

The record supports the trial court’s finding there was no exigency for dispensing with a warrant. It’s not the appellate court’s job to reweigh the evidence. State v. Ford, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 5289 (Fla. 2d DCA July 10, 2026).*

Defendant’s stop was for speeding both on the highway and in a construction zone. Upon smelling marijuana, it was not unreasonable for the officer to open the car door. State v. Jordan, 2026-Ohio-2625 (4th Dist. July 1, 2026).*

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Obtaining def’s juvenile records by subpoena is not a “search”; no REP

Sahan Journal: Minneapolis police drone debate draws packed crowds concerned about privacy

Sahan Journal: Minneapolis police drone debate draws packed crowds concerned about privacy by Mohamed Ibrahim (“Dozens of community members flooded Minneapolis City Hall Wednesday to express concerns about a proposed drone program for Minneapolis police. Nearly 50 people signed up to speak at the City Council’s public health, safety and equity committee meeting. Residents filled all of the seats in the council chambers reserved for the public, and an overflow room next door. ‘We just spent months enduring a brutal winter of military-equipped federal occupation and terrorization, and on the heels of that, you wish to provide military-grade drone tech to the cops in our already over-surveilled neighborhoods?’ said north Minneapolis resident Will Reely, referring to federal immigration enforcement during Operation Metro Surge. ‘You can’t be serious.’ Speakers said they don’t trust how the police would use drones, and are concerned the technology could be used as surveillance and lead to invasion of privacy.”)

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on Sahan Journal: Minneapolis police drone debate draws packed crowds concerned about privacy

CA11: Google computer’s CSAM hash value search and match was private search, noting circuit split

A Google computer’s hash value match of a file passing through Google to a CSAM image then forwarded on to NCMEC was a private search. The court agrees with the Fifth and Sixth Circuits holding that the private search doctrine applies, and noting: “The Second, Fourth, and Ninth Circuits have held, to the contrary, that a hash-value match cannot constitute a valid private search.” United States v. Brillhart, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 20138 (11th Cir. July 9, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Private search | Comments Off on CA11: Google computer’s CSAM hash value search and match was private search, noting circuit split

USA Today: Five GA cops used Flock cameras for personal searches, GBI says

USA Today: Five GA cops used Flock cameras for personal searches, GBI says by Irene Wright (“Five police officers have been accused of using Flock license plate camera technology in South Georgia to make personal searches, according to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation. The officers, formerly with the Albany Police Department, were charged with misuse of license plate data and violation of oath of office in a July 6 statement from the bureau. Tytianna Davis, 27, faces six counts, Jade Jackson, 32, faces three counts, Nicholas Richardson, 30, faces 12 counts, Brittney Smith, 23, faces two counts, and Issac Whitus, 24, faces three counts.”)

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on USA Today: Five GA cops used Flock cameras for personal searches, GBI says

CA7: Administrative inspection stop of truck without RS was pretext for drug search

Defendant showed that the administrative stop and inspection of this semi-truck was pretextual, without reasonable suspicion for the stop, and not in furtherance of the administrative program for truck inspections. Under Burger (its n.27), pretext can be an issue. United States v. Martinez, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 19808 (7th Cir. July 7, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Administrative search, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Administrative inspection stop of truck without RS was pretext for drug search

LA5: Nervousness and avoiding getting on airplane to LAX (a source city) was RS

DEA and State DTF officers had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant departing the NOLA airport for LAX (a source city) when he saw them as they looked all nervous and then walked away from boarding the airplane. State v. Wells, 2026 La. App. LEXIS 1347 (La. App. 5 Cir July 7, 2026).

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a Franks motion when defendant offers nothing to show it would have succeeded. Gilmore v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147995 (M.D. Fla. July 6, 2026).*

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress a digital search warrant that would not have succeeded. Smith v. State, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 427 (July 6, 2026).*

Plaintiff doesn’t show that the use of force here violated any clearly established law. Estate of Dismang v. Reed, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 19614 (10th Cir. July 6, 2026).*

Posted in Airport searches, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA5: Nervousness and avoiding getting on airplane to LAX (a source city) was RS

D.D.C.: A cell phone SW without PC in a felon in possession case is a general warrant because of its intrusiveness

Cell phone warrant for felon in possession case is quashed. No probable cause or nexus to the crime. Just because someone owns a cell phone doesn’t mean the government gets to search it. It is effectively a general warrant. United States v. Harris (In re Search of A Black Cellphone Currently Stored at the Metro. Police Department’s Evidence Control Branch in Wash. D.C. Under Rule 41), 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149838 (D.D.C. July 6, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Cell phones, General warrant, Nexus, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.D.C.: A cell phone SW without PC in a felon in possession case is a general warrant because of its intrusiveness

N.D.Ga.: 2020 election materials GJ subpoena quashed as burdensome

The grand jury subpoena for identifying details and contact information of every person who worked on the Fulton County 2020 general election is quashed. It’s apparent this is for an improper purpose, it’s way overbroad and intrusive (see F.R.Crim.P. 17 where subpoenas can be quashed if unreasonable and oppressive), and the five-year statute of limitations clearly has run, at the earliest, election certification day 2020. The government’s need for the information is low because it can’t extend the statute of limitations. The subpoena puts a high burden on the County, and it will deter people from every wanting to work elections in the future. Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections v. United States, 1:26-cv-02777-WMR (N.D. Ga. July 7, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: 2020 election materials GJ subpoena quashed as burdensome

SCOTUSBlog: Justice Jackson reignites the interpretation wars, adding to textualism’s emerging cracks

SCOTUSBlog: Justice Jackson reignites the interpretation wars, adding to textualism’s emerging cracks by Abbe Gluck:

Continue reading
Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Justice Jackson reignites the interpretation wars, adding to textualism’s emerging cracks

The Guardian: AI surveillance is being supercharged – and it will chill social progress

The Guardian: AI surveillance is being supercharged – and it will chill social progress by Bruce Schneier and Jon Penney (“These systems will soon be able to track our public and private lives. But we can make the policy choices to reject it.”)

Posted in AI, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Guardian: AI surveillance is being supercharged – and it will chill social progress

CA7: Scrolling through def’s cell phone was a reasonable border search

Scrolling through defendant’s cell phone was a reasonable border search. United States v. Eta, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 19568 (7th Cir. July 6, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on CA7: Scrolling through def’s cell phone was a reasonable border search

E.D.Ark.: Bivens not extended to knock-and-announce violation and shooting; FTCA applies instead

Bivens won’t be extended to an alleged knock-and-announce violation and a police shooting of the homeowner. SCOTUS should just go ahead and abandon Bivens. It proceeds as an FTCA case. Malinowski v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148126 (E.D. Ark. July 6, 2026).

An Ohio municipal court judge issuing a warrant for cell phone records in New Jersey was not a fundamental error and was subject to the good faith exception. State v. Tisdale, 2026-Ohio-2567 (7th Dist. July 1, 2026).*

Probable cause and nexus were shown for defendant’s cell phone in a drug trafficking conspiracy based on messages and calls between co-conspirators. United States v. Harris, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146630 (E.D. Mo. June 1, 2026).*

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Nexus, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Bivens not extended to knock-and-announce violation and shooting; FTCA applies instead

D.Mont.: This ping warrant was based on PC and was not governed by Chatrie

This cell phone ping warrant was based on a showing of probable cause. It was a one-time deal and didn’t involve the factors of Chatrie and geofence warrants. United States v. Kunz, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148872 (D. Mont. July 6, 2026).

Defendant’s stop was justified by a traffic offense, and he contradicted what officers had just observed, and then he attempted to flee. There was justification for extending the stop. Officers had his cell phones in hand when he fled. Their seizure was reasonable. United States v. Berry, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148778 (W.D. Mich. July 6, 2026).*

There was reasonable suspicion to continue the stop 24 minutes to wait for the drug dog which alerted. United States v. Carroll, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148675 (E.D. Tex. July 2, 2026).*

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Mont.: This ping warrant was based on PC and was not governed by Chatrie

KY: Unrelated questions during ongoing traffic stop didn’t extend it under Rodriguez

While the officer asked unrelated questions during the traffic stop, the mission of the stop was ongoing throughout. Therefore, the questions didn’t really extend the stop. Miller v. Commonwealth, 2026 Ky. App. LEXIS 64 (July 2, 2026).

The officer saw defendant following too close behind a truck, and that gave an objectively reasonable basis for this stop. [Four minutes into the stop, a drug dog was called, and not a word about reasonable suspicion for that.] United States v. Gilley, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111425 (W.D. Ark. May 20, 2026).*

Defendant lacked any standing in the property searched. Also, the locks had been changed by the time of the search, and he had no access then. United States v. Reger, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148699 (E.D. Cal. July 2, 2026).*

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on KY: Unrelated questions during ongoing traffic stop didn’t extend it under Rodriguez

TX1: Defendant had no REP in a package of drugs he never possessed and on another person

Defendant lacked standing to suppress 4,100 grams of ketamine seized from Brown because he never possessed the package, had no reasonable expectation of privacy in package of drugs carried by Brown, and the ketamine was recovered away from him during Brown’s separate arrest outside the Holiday Inn. But, law enforcement lacked probable cause to arrest him because he merely drove Brown to the Holiday Inn, parked, walked behind the hotel, returned with a water bottle, and appeared nervous when confronted by police – conduct consistent with innocent activity that did not establish criminal behavior. Akinrinlola v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 4935 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) May 28, 2026)

The statement in the affidavit for BAC warrant was accurate because it was what the officer was told, even if he had no personal knowledge that alcohol could be smelled on defendant in the ambulance. State v. Berretta, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 410 (June 30, 2026).*

Defendant lacked standing to challenge the search of the car he was a passenger in. Besides, in the bodycam video, he denies ever being in the car. United States v. Thompson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147854 (D.D.C. July 3, 2026).*

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on TX1: Defendant had no REP in a package of drugs he never possessed and on another person

Stone v. Powell decided 50 years ago today

Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465 (1976), barring habeas review of Fourth Amendment claims was decided 50 years ago today.

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on Stone v. Powell decided 50 years ago today

DC: Officers were a good ways away from def when he fled without any apparent reason

“We now hold that the officers had the requisite reasonable articulable suspicion to justify their seizure of D.W. when they grabbed his leg. We reach that conclusion largely because D.W. ran upon the mere sight of police officers approaching from a substantial distance, with little indication that they were intent on stopping, searching, or even questioning him in particular. D.W. had not been singled out in any way and, to that point, had little reason to think he could not simply go about his business.” D.W. v. United States, 2026 D.C. App. LEXIS 222 (July 2, 2026).

A storage company owner’s citizen call to police that defendant was a felon with a gun was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s detention. Then his words resulted in handcuffing. United States v. Westfield, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120520 (E.D. Okla. May 5, 2026),* adopted, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118669 (E.D. Okla. May 29, 2026).*

Defendant’s Franks challenge “misses the mark.” He challenges reference to a hand-to-hand transaction. The officer’s trial testimony referred to another time, not the one in the affidavit. United States v. Rosario, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 19242 (3d Cir. July 1, 2026).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DC: Officers were a good ways away from def when he fled without any apparent reason

Cell phone GPS: WaPo: This little blue dot on your phone is a revolutionary invention

WaPo: This little blue dot on your phone is a revolutionary invention by Katherine Dunn (“U.S. policy used to jam up GPS. Now, those signals beam into your pocket.”):

Continue reading
Posted in Cell phones, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on Cell phone GPS: WaPo: This little blue dot on your phone is a revolutionary invention

D.S.D.: No RS on totality when drug dog called for

The USMJ found that the officers abandoned the mission of the traffic stop (for Rodriguez purposes) when they called for the drug dog. So, the question is then whether there was reasonable suspicion at that point, and the answer is no. R&R adopted granting motion to suppress. United States v. Ruegge, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147661 (D.S.D. June 29, 2026).* A helpful discussion on reasonable suspicion on the totality:

Continue reading
Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: No RS on totality when drug dog called for