Treatise 30% off through 5/27

here use code MEMDAY26

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Treatise 30% off through 5/27

KS: Petr’s disclaimer of seized cash was a lack of standing in a forfeiture

Claimant’s disclaimer in the money should have been decided first, not the merits of the search. It’s essentially a lack of standing. State ex rel. Kansas Highway Patrol v. $381,620 in U.S. Currency, 2026 Kan. LEXIS 125 (May 15, 2026).

The original cell phone warrant application was unsigned. Ultimately, trial court held that it couldn’t be used by either side at the trial, except for impeachment if necessary. People v. Zakrzewski, 2026 NY Slip Op 03029 (3d Dept. May 14, 2026).*

Even if partial suppression could have succeeded in this case [something doubtful], the remaining counts support the drug weight calculation. Antonio v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106688 (D.N.J. May 14, 2026).*

The stop was with reasonable suspicion based on collective knowledge, and the search warrant was based on valid informant hearsay. United States v. Graves, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106702 (S.D. Ind. May 14, 2026).*

Posted in Collective knowledge, Forfeiture, Standing | Comments Off on KS: Petr’s disclaimer of seized cash was a lack of standing in a forfeiture

N.D.Fla.: Monitored bowel movement in prison didn’t violate 4A

In prison, “the visual strip search and the monitored bowel movement did not violate the Fourth Amendment.” McDonald v. Spears, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107383 (N.D. Fla. Apr. 6, 2026).

Defendant’s consent to search his cell phone was limited and narrow, and the officer’s exceeding the scope of consent justifies suppression of that part. United States v. Hernandez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106625 (S.D. Tex. May 13, 2026).

The state sought a BAC warrant after a fatal accident when defendant first refused a breath test. He later consented to a breath test. That doesn’t void the warrant. People v. Santa Clara Cty. Superior Court, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 298 (6th Dist. May 14, 2026).*

Immigration arrest warrants don’t need to be signed by judicial officers. Mong C. ex rel. Uphaphon P. v. Mullin, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106559 (D. Minn. May 14, 2026).*

Posted in Consent, Immigration arrests, Prison and jail searches, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: Monitored bowel movement in prison didn’t violate 4A

WaPo: AI license plate cameras tore this town apart and led to a state of emergency

WaPo: AI license plate cameras tore this town apart and led to a state of emergency by Annie Gowen (“In Troy, New York, residents and city officials are at odds over police use of Flock cameras, which some call a safety tool and others see as surveillance.”):

Continue reading
Posted in AI, Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on WaPo: AI license plate cameras tore this town apart and led to a state of emergency

D.Ariz.: No constitutional obligation for officers to keep investigating past having PC

“To the extent that Plaintiffs’ claim is based on Defendant Pelham’s failure to conduct a more thorough investigation before seeking a warrant, it likewise fails. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants ‘failed to undertake minimally adequate investigative steps before seeking a warrant[.]’ … However, ‘[o]nce he has probable cause, an officer is not ordinarily required to continue to investigate or seek further corroboration.’ Ewing v. City of Stockton, 588 F.3d 1218, 1227 (9th Cir. 2009); U.S. v. Thoms, 2011 WL 87337, at *3 (D. Alaska 2011). …” Baker v. Pelham, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106636 (D. Ariz. May 14, 2026).

“Given the facts that the police officers smelled marijuana on Walker’s person, he had just exited his vehicle, and he admitted that there was weed and a gun in the car, the officers lawfully searched and impounded Walker’s vehicle for their safety and to safeguard any evidence that could be concealed or destroyed. We determine from this record that the trial court did not err when it denied Walker’s motion to suppress.” State v. Walker, 2026-Ohio-1767 (8th Dist. May 14, 2026).*

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in non-legal jail calls. United States v. Mendoza, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106384 (M.D. Pa. May 14, 2026).*

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: No constitutional obligation for officers to keep investigating past having PC

Today is the 72d anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education

Today is the 72d anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education, May 17, 1954. Not a 4A case, but so important to our constitutional history.

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Today is the 72d anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education

GA: No REP in what a security camera saw that def installed in friends’ house when he was there sexually assaulting their daughter

Defendant was a friend of the family, and he came over to install an additional security camera inside the house. Later, that camera caught him sexually assaulting one of the girls. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy despite spending the night there on occasion, including this one. The recording didn’t violate the state eavesdropping statute. Baughcum v. State, 2026 Ga. App. LEXIS 239 (May 13, 2026).*

Continuing a knock-and-talk at a domestic disturbance and finally entering was all supported by exigency. Meyer v. State, 2026 Ind. App. LEXIS 162 (May 12, 2026).*

There is no confrontation right to cross-examine the CI who did the buy that led to the warrant who never testified at trial. United States v. Geer, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105511 (N.D. Ohio May 13, 2026).*

Posted in Informant hearsay, Knock and talk, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA: No REP in what a security camera saw that def installed in friends’ house when he was there sexually assaulting their daughter

DC: Def seized when blocked on sidewalk not just when taken down

Defendant was seized when he was blocked by officers when he was walking, not just when he was taken down to the sidewalk. Greer v. United States, 2026 D.C. App. LEXIS 168 (May 14, 2026).

Defendant was stopped because his LPN was expired. Then the officer found his DL was also expired. The car was going to be towed, and the inventory was valid. Hinton v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 276 (May 12, 2026).*

Defendant was handcuffed and in custody during execution of the search warrant for his place. His statements then were voluntary. United States v. Vélez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105108 (D.P.R. May 8, 2026).*

Posted in Custody, Inventory, Seizure | Comments Off on DC: Def seized when blocked on sidewalk not just when taken down

TX: What does state need to raise when it appeals a suppression order?

An interesting opinion on appellate practice: The issue here: Whether the state waived one of its two arguments for sustaining a search by not appealing it. The court concludes it did not. Remanded. State v. Young, 2026 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 326 (May 14, 2026)*:

Continue reading
Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on TX: What does state need to raise when it appeals a suppression order?

SC: DNA sample by SW two weeks before trial was independent of one three years earlier during investigation

Defendant wasn’t in custody in a murder investigation when officers obtained a DNA sample from him in 2019, they believed voluntarily. As the case came closer to trial, the defense moved to suppress it because he’d lawyered up, so they thought. Using only the 2019 pre-DNA information, officers obtained a DNA search warrant two weeks before trial. This warrant was valid by independent source and inevitable discovery. State v. Cornish, 2026 S.C. App. LEXIS 34 (May 13, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in DNA, Independent source, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on SC: DNA sample by SW two weeks before trial was independent of one three years earlier during investigation

W.D.Wash.: Immigration arrest warrants can be signed by ALJs without violating 4A

“‘[C]onsistent with the Fourth Amendment, immigration authorities may arrest individuals for civil immigration removal purposes pursuant to an administrative arrest warrant issued by an executive official, rather than by a judge.’ Gonzalez v. U.S. Immigr. & Customs Enf’t, 975 F.3d 788, 825 (9th Cir. 2020) (citing Abel v. United States, 362 U.S. 217, 230-34, 80 S. Ct. 683, 4 L. Ed. 2d 668 (1960)).” Smith v. Hernandez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105969 (W.D. Wash. May 13, 2026).*

Defendant’s guilty plea waived his Fourth Amendment claim. He would lose on the merits anyway because the basis of knowledge of the CI was shown. People v. Delrio, 2026 NY Slip Op 02937, 2026 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3111 (1st Dept. May 12, 2026).*

A check was found during a probation search, and it is not suppressed. The fact “papers” are mentioned in the Fourth Amendment doesn’t give them any special meaning in this context. United States v. Luc, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104901 (E.D.N.Y. May 12, 2026).*

Posted in Immigration arrests, Probation / Parole search, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Immigration arrest warrants can be signed by ALJs without violating 4A

D.R.I.: DOJ administrative subpoena for children’s medical records quashed; DOJ’s “presumption of regularity” is gone

This administrative subpoena for Rhode Island children’s medical records is quashed. DOJ’s presumption of regularity of its actions is now gone. In re Administrative Subpoena 25-1431-032 to R.I. Hosp., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105676 (D.R.I. May 13, 2026) (Update: ATL: DOJ Gets Nuked By RI Judge For ‘Appalling’ Lack Of Candor by Liz Dye). From the case:

Continue reading
Posted in Administrative search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.R.I.: DOJ administrative subpoena for children’s medical records quashed; DOJ’s “presumption of regularity” is gone

FL3: Feds raided with SW but wouldn’t provide state with affidavit or warrant; state fails in burden of proving search was valid, even pleading GFE

Defendant was raided by the federal government for alleged cockfighting, and he claimed that “80-100” officers showed up “with bullet proof cars and ‘one of those war tanks.’” The product of the raid was given over to the state and the government passed on the case. The federal government refused to give the warrant and its application to the state to prosecute. The motion to suppress was denied by the trial court relying on the good faith exception. On appeal, it is granted. The lack of a warrant in the record puts the burden on the state, and it doesn’t carry it, not even on good faith. Cabrera v. State, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 3678 (Fla. 3d DCA May 13, 2026).

On the totality, reasonable suspicion developed during the traffic stop on collective knowledge to continue it for two more minutes until the drug dog arrived. United States v. Trent, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 13410 (6th Cir. May 7, 2026).*

Defendant didn’t make a clear record of how long it took the drug dog to get to his traffic stop for Rodriguez purposes. But, it doesn’t matter because there was reasonable suspicion of a felony at the conclusion of the tasks of the stop. Schwartz v. State, 2026 Ark. App. 305 (May 13, 2026).*

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL3: Feds raided with SW but wouldn’t provide state with affidavit or warrant; state fails in burden of proving search was valid, even pleading GFE

NM: Prosecutor’s question about PC for arrest warrant being found improper, but not reversible error here

It was improper for the prosecutor to question the arresting officer about the judge finding probable cause and issuing the arrest warrant. But, it was not so flagrant here to require reversal. State v. Aragon, 2026 N.M. LEXIS 81 (May 11, 2026):
https://nmonesource.com/nmos/nmsc/en/538190/1/document.do

Continue reading
Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on NM: Prosecutor’s question about PC for arrest warrant being found improper, but not reversible error here

CA4: Criminal seizure of evidence here not a 4A or due process violation

Motorcycles under lien were seized as evidence in a biker shootout. The finance company sued under the Fourth Amendment and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Deprivation of property as criminal evidence is not a violation of due process or the Fourth Amendment. Am. Acceptance Corp. of SC v. Gietz, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 13629 (4th Cir. May 12, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Due process, Seizure | Comments Off on CA4: Criminal seizure of evidence here not a 4A or due process violation

E.D.La.: ICE SDT to Orleans Parish Sheriff for immigration status of detainees was valid

ICE issued a subpoena to the Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff for information about detainees’ immigration status. After oral argument, the subpoena was narrowed, and it now complies with Morton Salt which “incorporates the Fourth Amendment reasonableness standard that applies to administrative subpoenas.” United States v. Woodfork, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103908 (E.D. La. May 11, 2026).

Officers had a search warrant for defendant’s house. A drug dog alerted on his car parked in the curtilage. The search of the car was justified by the dog alert. [And likely would have been under the warrant anyway.] State v. Desarro, 2026-Ohio-1672 (7th Dist. May 7, 2026).*

In a 2255, omission of the homeowner’s name in a search warrant is not a constitutional error that defense counsel should have raised. Besides, it’s not in the record. United States v. Holland, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102835 (W.D. La. May 7, 2026).*

Posted in Administrative search, Dog sniff, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.La.: ICE SDT to Orleans Parish Sheriff for immigration status of detainees was valid

E.D.Tenn.: PO not needed for a parole search

Defendant’s claim of “reverse stalking horse” parole search because the PO wasn’t present fails. There was reasonable suspicion for the search. United States v. Rose, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103581 (E.D. Tenn. May 11, 2026).

The government gets the credibility determination of the officers that there was reasonable suspicion to believe defendant was armed when he was seen by officers. Two of three mentioned the gun in reports, but they didn’t compare notes. It’s not really visible in the video. United States v. Cabán-Cancel, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102872 (D.P.R. May 7, 2026)

Probable cause is not an element of refusal of a BAC test, and there was no motion to suppress filed here. City of Bismarck v. Herrera, 2026 ND 97 (May 7, 2026).*

Minnesota declines to adopt a subjective intent for the emergency aid exception under the state constitution. State v. Gale, 2026 Minn. App. LEXIS 195 (May 11, 2026).*

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: PO not needed for a parole search

CA10: Officer’s peering through 1″ gap in curtains from outside was plain view

Denial of rehearing en banc: United States v. Watkins, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 13495 (10th Cir. May 11, 2026),* denial of rehearing en banc from United States v. Watkins, 156 F.4th 1049 (10th Cir. 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Officer’s peering through 1″ gap in curtains from outside was plain view

VI: Cell phone SW didn’t show nexus to crime; possession alone not enough

There was a lack of nexus to cell phone to this alleged crime which voids the search warrant for it, and the good faith exception does not apply. Just having a cell phone on one’s person doesn’t link it to their alleged crime. People v. Cumberbatch, 2025 VI 7, 2026 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 12 (May 8, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on VI: Cell phone SW didn’t show nexus to crime; possession alone not enough

D.Md.: Mere delay in opening hotel door for arrest warrant didn’t justify protective sweep under the mattress

The protective sweep of defendant’s room is suppressed because the government articulates no reasonable suspicion to believe anyone else was in there. Delay in opening the door isn’t it. Searching between the mattress and box springs was also unreasonable. Waiting eight months to execute an arrest warrant wasn’t unreasonable. The government fails in showing inevitable discovery. United States v. Cleckley, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101993 (D. Md. May 8, 2026).

“The stop and seizure of Melton did not violate the Fourth Amendment since the officers performed community caretaking functions initially, and Melton’s stopped vehicle constituted a traffic violation that along with the officers’ knowledge of a probation violation warrant associated with a weapons charge for the registered owner of the vehicle, provided the officers with justification to open the vehicle doors, help remove Melton from the vehicle and further investigate to confirm the warrant.” United States v. Melton, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102142 (N.D. Ohio May 8, 2026).*

Defendant filed a Franks motion that was previously denied for lack of materiality. With some new evidence, he filed another one, but this is denied as conclusory and doesn’t overcome the prior holding. United States v. Hardison, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102503 (E.D. Tenn. May 8, 2026).*

Posted in Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.Md.: Mere delay in opening hotel door for arrest warrant didn’t justify protective sweep under the mattress