CA2: No 4A requirement for SWs being issued with notice to target

Search warrants are usually issued ex parte, and there’s no Fourth Amendment justification for advance notice to the target of the search. It avoids warning the target to destroy or hide evidence or flee. United States v. Leeper, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 24432 (2d Cir. Aug. 13, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA2: No 4A requirement for SWs being issued with notice to target

CA6: Denying ptf access to his own bathroom during a search of his house stated 4A claim

“In light of totality of the circumstances of this case, we thus ask whether Plaintiff has plausibly alleged that Defendant Josephs’ repeated refusal of Plaintiff’s requests to use his own restroom rendered Plaintiff’s seizure unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Though we are not limited to the Graham factors we use typically to evaluate a Fourth Amendment excessive force claim, discussion of those factors is instructive. Based on the following, we find that Plaintiff has plausibly plead a § 1983 Fourth Amendment unreasonable seizure claim.” Antol v. English, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 24454 (6th Cir. Aug. 13, 2026).

Delaware’s search and seizure provision follows Pennsylvania’s, not the Fourth Amendment. Calm v. Taylor, 2026 Del. Ch. LEXIS 343 (Aug. 11, 2026).

“Defendant’s attempt to characterize the encounter as a roadside strip search is not supported by the record. All three officers testified that Defendant’s genitalia and buttocks remained clothed.” United States v. Nelson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180844 (D. Me. Aug. 13, 2026).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Seizure, State constitution, Strip search | Comments Off on CA6: Denying ptf access to his own bathroom during a search of his house stated 4A claim

W.D.Mo.: Not exactly following the inventory policy doesn’t make it unreasonable under 4A

Not exactly following the inventory policy doesn’t make it unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Maldonadochavarria, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180956 (W.D. Mo. July 13, 2026).

“Here, King was placed in handcuffs and moved from the Rite Shop to the parking lot and placed in a police cruiser. While King was placed in handcuffs, only three minutes passed between King being placed in handcuffs in the Rite Shop and law enforcement searching the fanny pack to discover the firearm and the drugs. Indeed, upon King’s initial detention, law enforcement diligently searched for the fanny pack and found it approximately 90 seconds later. The Court accordingly finds that King’s brief detention in the police cruiser did not transform the Terry stop into a full arrest.” United States v. King, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180922 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 13, 2026).*

Defense counsel was ineffective for not filing a plausible motion to suppress. Defense counsel was deficient in communicating with defendant and kept saying he was working on a motion to suppress but one was never filed. United States v. Jones, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181146 (D. Kan. Aug. 13, 2026).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Not exactly following the inventory policy doesn’t make it unreasonable under 4A

GA: No IAC for not challenging complete cell phone download before search

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging a complete cell phone download as overbroad before the search because no binding case says it is. Lenon v. State, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 250 (Aug. 13, 2026).

The question is not whether plaintiff was speeding. It’s whether there was probable cause to believe he was, and it was reasonable for the officer to think that. Henderson v. Vill. of New Holland, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23845 (6th Cir. Aug. 7, 2026).*

“Although the street was residential and turning on hazard lights may be an innocent act, based on the proximity to the border, characteristics of the area, Agent Egbert’s knowledge of previous unlawful border crossings in the area, and the known border crossing just north of the white Mercedes parked location, he had reasonable suspicion to conduct the investigatory stop. Because reasonable suspicion existed, no unlawful seizure occurred and thus the fhiit of the seizure need not be suppressed.” United States v. Lin, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181512 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 13, 2026).*

Posted in Cell phones, immigration stops, Overbreadth, Probable cause | Comments Off on GA: No IAC for not challenging complete cell phone download before search

DNYUZ: CBP Workers Allegedly Used Government Databases to Spy on Exes, Crushes, and Colleagues

DNYUZ: CBP Workers Allegedly Used Government Databases to Spy on Exes, Crushes, and Colleagues:

Continue reading
Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on DNYUZ: CBP Workers Allegedly Used Government Databases to Spy on Exes, Crushes, and Colleagues

ABAJ: Is resetting your phone after being stopped by Border Patrol agents a federal offense?

ABAJ: Is resetting your phone after being stopped by Border Patrol agents a federal offense? By Anna Stolley Persky:

Continue reading
Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on ABAJ: Is resetting your phone after being stopped by Border Patrol agents a federal offense?

NYT: Flock Announces Privacy Updates to Its Car-Tracking Cameras

NYT: Flock Announces Privacy Updates to Its Car-Tracking Cameras by Aruni Soni (“Critics say the measures are “public relations” and leave room for continued misuse.”):

Continue reading
Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on NYT: Flock Announces Privacy Updates to Its Car-Tracking Cameras

S.D.N.Y.: Project Veritas SW unsealed with limited redactions

One of the Project Veritas search warrant affidavits is partially redacted for privacy of some people and ordered filed. Redactions must be limited. In re Search Warrant Dated Nov. 5, 2021, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179075 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 11, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Project Veritas SW unsealed with limited redactions

D.Ariz.: SW for firearm didn’t go stale

This search warrant for a firearm wasn’t stale because firearms are kept. In any event, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Cherry, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178900 (D. Ariz. Aug. 11, 2026).*

Defendant’s failure to file a post-trial motion on his denied suppression motion in a stipulated bench trial was waiver for appeal. People v. Haskins, 2026 IL App (4th) 250903 (Aug. 4, 2026).*

Defendant ran from his car and thus abandoned it sitting on a sidewalk in front of a dilapidated building. Alternatively, officers were concerned someone else could be in the vehicle and they couldn’t see in because of the dark tint. United States v. Wiley, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23873 (7th Cir. Aug. 6, 2026).*

Defendant’s claim on appeal that his DNA was improperly seized was waived by lack of a record to evaluate it. State v. Woods, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 508 (Aug. 7, 2026).*

Posted in Abandonment, Burden of pleading, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: SW for firearm didn’t go stale

VA: Reverse keyword search warrant to Google decided on GFE but not merits

Reverse keyword search warrant to Google connected defendant to this crime. It’s not like geofence warrants in Chatrie, but the merits aren’t decided because the good faith exception applies in any event. Clements v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 428 (Aug. 11, 2026). (You never have to decide the merits as long as you can go back to the good faith exception.)

Continue reading
Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on VA: Reverse keyword search warrant to Google decided on GFE but not merits

N.D.Ohio: Two dog sniffs didn’t provide PC for vehicle search

The first dog sniff didn’t provide probable cause, but it did provide reasonable suspicion to continue the stop longer. Then a second sniff didn’t either. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Copeland, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178749 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 11, 2026).*

“Moreover, his claim … that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise a Fourth Amendment issue on direct appeal are raised for the first time in his COA motion and, accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider them.” United States v. Najera, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23934 (5th Cir. Aug. 5, 2026).*

Warrantless seizure of defendant’s cell phone was reasonable during a drug investigation where the cell phone was linked to the crime because the co-conspirators were talking on the phone regularly during the conspiracy. United States v. Veilleux, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176947 (D. Mont. Aug. 7, 2026).*

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Two dog sniffs didn’t provide PC for vehicle search

GA reaffirms a constitutional right of privacy in medical records

Georgia reaffirms there is a constitutional right of privacy in medical records. Here it was a civil discovery dispute. Goodell v. Moulton, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 232 (Aug. 11, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA reaffirms a constitutional right of privacy in medical records

N.D.Ohio: Dog sniff during initial records check did not extend the stop

The stop was not extended by the drug dog that arrived almost immediately and the sniff was done while the records check was going on. Alternatively, there was reasonable suspicion for it. United States v. Billips, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176422 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 7, 2026).

The GPS tracking warrant and search warrants were based on probable cause. United States v. Vega, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177407 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 3, 2026).*

During execution of a CSAM search warrant, officers detained defendant while they were holding rifles, and a reasonable person wouldn’t think he was free to leave. [Screenshot in opinion.] He was thus in custody when questioned and his statements are suppressed. The search warrant, however, is valid. United States v. Germano, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177330 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2026).*

There is a question of fact for trial on whether the defendant officer unreasonably used deadly force on plaintiff, and the qualified immunity appeal is dismissed. Tippitt v. Iversen, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23944 (5th Cir. Aug. 5, 2026).*

Posted in Custody, Dog sniff, Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Dog sniff during initial records check did not extend the stop

E.D.Mo.: Seizure of def’s Apple watch was valid as a search incident because it could be used to erase iPhone

Seizure of defendant’s Apple watch was valid incident to arrest because officers feared he could erase his iPhone with it. The traffic stop might have been pretextual, but it doesn’t matter because defendant had an arrest warrant on a federal indictment pending. As to a Franks challenge, defendant fails in his offer of proof. United States v. Avery, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177942 (E.D. Mo. July 2, 2026).

Defendant was stopped for driving his rental car too long in the passing lane. The car smelled of burnt marijuana. On the totality, including defendant’s priors for drugs, the officer had reasonable suspicion to continue the stop because he suspected defendant was carrying drugs between Harrisburg and Lancaster. Commonwealth v. Gould, 2026 Pa. Super. LEXIS 420 (Aug. 10, 2026).*

Defendant’s stop for a traffic offense was reasonable because there was a factual basis, no matter the officer’s motivation. Then reasonable suspicion developed. United States v. Billips, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176422 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 7, 2026).*

Posted in Pretext, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Seizure of def’s Apple watch was valid as a search incident because it could be used to erase iPhone

Truthout: First Came the Flock Cameras. Now Local Cops Want Autonomous Drones.

Truthout: First Came the Flock Cameras. Now Local Cops Want Autonomous Drones. by Michael Ludwig (“Hundreds of local police departments have received waivers to fly surveillance drones that navigate with AI.”):

Continue reading
Posted in Drones | Comments Off on Truthout: First Came the Flock Cameras. Now Local Cops Want Autonomous Drones.

NYT: The Surveillance Network Tracking Cars Across the U.S.

NYT: The Surveillance Network Tracking Cars Across the U.S. (there are now 120,000 cameras).

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on NYT: The Surveillance Network Tracking Cars Across the U.S.

D.N.M.: 2¼ hour detention was still with RS despite 10th Cir.’s 90-minute limit

“Defendant was detained from approximately 4:45 a.m. until his release at around 7:00 a.m., a total duration of two hours and 15 minutes. … Having concluded that the initial detention was lawful, the Court must next address whether the detention was reasonable in length and scope. While facts support both sides of the argument, the two-hour timeline presents a close, borderline case because it exceeds the Tenth Circuit’s 90-minute reference point for investigative detentions and approaches a de facto arrest requiring probable cause. On balance, however, the Court leans toward the position that the detention remained constitutionally permissible.” United States v. Morales-Aguirre, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175394 (D.N.M. Aug. 6, 2026).

There was probable cause and exigency for seizure of defendant’s cell phone during a traffic stop in a drug investigation. The search warrant for the phone detailed the probable cause for its search. United States v. Veilleux, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176947 (D. Mont. Aug. 7, 2026).*

2255 petitioner’s Rule 60 motion that the court failed to consider his ineffective assistance of counsel on a Fourth Amendment claim is just wrong. It did. Benjamin v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176803 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 7, 2026).*

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: 2¼ hour detention was still with RS despite 10th Cir.’s 90-minute limit

W.D.Pa.: ALPR hit on stolen vehicle was RS for stop

A U-Haul van was reported stolen by them, and the LPN was entered into the ALPR database. It showed up near Pittsburgh, and that was reasonable suspicion to pull it over. United States v. Lewis, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177108 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2026).

Defendant was detained in his own home during a search, and he would not consider himself free to leave for custody purposes. United States v. Cruz, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176020 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2026).*

Raising a Fourth Amendment claim for the first time in the request for the certificate of appealability of a 2255 is waiver. United States v. Najera, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23934 (5th Cir. Aug. 5, 2026).*

Defendant was involved in three controlled buys and that was probable cause for his arrest without a warrant, and his search incident was valid. State v. Daniels, 2026-Ohio-3050 (6th Dist. Aug. 7, 2026).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automatic license plate readers, Custody, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: ALPR hit on stolen vehicle was RS for stop

S.D.Miss.: Cell tower dump violated 4A as a de facto geofence warrant

U.S. District Judge affirms U.S.M.J.’s decision that cell tower dumps violated the Fourth Amendment. The request was essentially a geofence warrant without a showing of need. In re Four Applications for Search Warrants Seeking Info. Associated with Particular Cellular Towers, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176165 (S.D. Miss. Aug. 5, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Cell phones, geofence | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: Cell tower dump violated 4A as a de facto geofence warrant

NC: Def’s bloody shirt seized as evidence from ER didn’t need a SW to test for DNA

Defendant was a suspect in a shooting incident. At the ER, his bloody shirt was collected as evidence. A separate search warrant wasn’t required to test the DNA on it. State v. Howze, 2026 N.C. App. LEXIS 652 (Aug. 5, 2026).

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not objecting during voir dire to mention of informant recorded statements of the accused because there was no basis to exclude them. United States v. Hossain, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175221 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2026).*

Whether the first search warrant was valid is a moot point because nothing from it is being used in the case. [It was suspect, but moot.] The second search of defendant’s store for counterfeit goods was by consent. United States v. Vasquez-Yax, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175645 (W.D.N.C. June 17, 2026),* adopted, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174947 (W.D. N.C. Aug. 6, 2026).*

Posted in Consent, DNA, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NC: Def’s bloody shirt seized as evidence from ER didn’t need a SW to test for DNA