MD: Hot pursuit can be days later, here exigent CSLI to find him

Police had court ordered exigent CSLI from that and a cell site simulator once he was identified as the shooter in a murder 13 days earlier. He was on the run into North Carolina and was eluding capture. This amounted to hot pursuit. Thomas v. State, 2026 Md. App. LEXIS 515 (May 1, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Hot pursuit | Comments Off on MD: Hot pursuit can be days later, here exigent CSLI to find him

D.D.C.: Alleged illegal arrest doesn’t void DNA SW

Defendant’s allegedly unlawful arrest doesn’t void the later search warrant for a DNA swab based on independent grounds, and not mentioning the alleged illegal arrest. United States v. Smith, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96554 (D.D.C. May 1, 2026).

Driving a moped on the sidewalk and not wearing a helmet was justification for defendant’s stop, and a gun was legitimately found. United States v. Northover, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95711 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2026).*

Defendant’s general motion to suppress is denied. It doesn’t allege how any rights were violated or what was seized. People v. Louis, 2026 NYLJ LEXIS 734 (N.Y. Co. May 1, 2026).*

An overly intrusive state ordered medical exam can violate clearly established law. Wright v. Talamantes, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 12696 (9th Cir. May 1, 2026).*

Posted in Body searches, Burden of pleading, DNA, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Alleged illegal arrest doesn’t void DNA SW

S.D.Fla.: Inventory that omitted “miscellaneous personal items” was not unreasonable

A “clumsy” inventory that omitted “miscellaneous personal items” was not an unreasonable inventory. No level of specificity is required. United States v. Samuels, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96304 (S.D. Fla. May 1, 2026).

The CSAM search warrant here for ten years’ worth of information in specific categories was not overbroad. The state alleged information that supported ten years’ worth. Defendant argues that they were only entitled to two months’ worth. State v. Difilippo, 2026 Del. Super. LEXIS 201 (Apr. 24, 2026).*

Defendant got six extensions of time to file a suppression motion and was still untimely. Exercising discretion, the court goes to the merits [likely to preempt an IAC claim] and finds the search warrant was issued with probable cause based on reliable informant hearsay. United States v. Hardison, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95414 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 30, 2026).*

Posted in Informant hearsay, Inventory, Overbreadth | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Inventory that omitted “miscellaneous personal items” was not unreasonable

CA4: That ptf charged with witness intimidation didn’t do it again wasn’t material for Franks

Defendant was charged with witness intimidation for contact with a witness in a criminal case of his. That charge was later dropped, and he sued. Defendants didn’t violate Franks by not mentioning that he never did it again. That’s not material. Brown v. Lott, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 12714 (4th Cir. Apr. 28, 2026).

“[T]he four confidential informants and one anonymous tipster are reliable, corroborated by independent evidence and each other, and support finding probable cause. Three informants have a history of providing reliable information. … Further, three informants provided information against their penal interests by describing their personal involvement with Velisek, so those statements are ‘presumptively credible.’” United States v. Velisek, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96136 (D. Minn. May 1, 2026).

The court’s clarifying question asked during the suppression hearing did not violate due process. Courts can ask some questions, and there was no objection at the time. United States v. Neel, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 12681 (11th Cir. May 1, 2026).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA4: That ptf charged with witness intimidation didn’t do it again wasn’t material for Franks

CO: Not 4A or state constitutional violation for govt to access def’s computer via peer-to-peer sharing with BitTorrent software

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in files on his computer that were open for peer-to-peer sharing. Therefore, when the government used BitTorrent to access his computer, it did not violate the Fourth Amendment or the state constitution. People v. Slusher, 2026 COA 30 (Apr. 30, 2026).

Decedent’s traffic stop led to him being shot and killed. Plaintiff plausibly alleged a Fourth Amendment excessive force claim. Beck v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93300 (D.N.M. Apr. 27, 2026).*

Under Stone, the inquiry is whether the state provided a mechanism to litigate Fourth Amendment claims before trial. The state does here. Cooper v. Cool, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95023 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 30, 2026).*

2254 petitioner’s Fourth Amendment claim is Stoned out. No COA on that or other issues in the case. Zuniga v. Marinich, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 12575 (6th Cir. Apr. 29, 2026).*

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Excessive force, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CO: Not 4A or state constitutional violation for govt to access def’s computer via peer-to-peer sharing with BitTorrent software

WSJ: ‘We Know You Live Right Here’: No Secrets in America’s New Surveillance Dragnet

WSJ: ‘We Know You Live Right Here’: No Secrets in America’s New Surveillance Dragnet By Shane Shifflett & Hannah Critchfield (“Technical wizardry used to combat illegal immigration also funnels the personal data and whereabouts of U.S. citizens to federal agents”):

Continue reading
Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WSJ: ‘We Know You Live Right Here’: No Secrets in America’s New Surveillance Dragnet

NY Columbia Co.: Alleged excessive nervousness when multiple police cars arrive at a traffic stop doesn’t add to RS

Defendant’s alleged excessive nervousness wasn’t visible on the video. And, even if he was, that’s a reasonable response to multiple police cars showing up for a routine traffic stop. No reasonable suspicion to continue the stop. People v. Thomas, 2026 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3967 (Columbia Co. Apr. 27, 2026).

The government [pretty obviously] showed probable cause for prospective cell phone location information of a California to New York drug conspiracy. United States v. Guadarrama, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93491 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2026).*

Defendant in his rented truck violated two traffic laws. While the officer was following he checked the license plate reader information that showed the truck had made a quick round trip from Colorado to California. It turned out his girlfriend had rented the truck, but nothing on the rental agreement made him an authorized driver. A drug dog was run around the truck after calling in the information he had and before issuing any citations. The dog alerted, and the use of the ALPR didn’t cause the stop. United States v. Salcido-Gonzalez, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 12341 (10th Cir. Apr. 29, 2026).*

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Cell phones | Comments Off on NY Columbia Co.: Alleged excessive nervousness when multiple police cars arrive at a traffic stop doesn’t add to RS

CA4: Backpack dumped in flight in grandmother’s yard was abandoned

Defendant fled the police and tried dumping his backpack at his grandmother’s house. She opened the door, saw what was happening, and shut the door. Continuing to flee, he dumped the backpack on her curtilage. It was found abandoned. United States v. Lodge, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 12547 (4th Cir. Apr. 30, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on CA4: Backpack dumped in flight in grandmother’s yard was abandoned

GA: Virtually all-inclusive list of items to be seized wasn’t overbroad

The warrant was all inclusive of drug information including use of the proceeds, and it didn’t violate particularity. Ball v. State, 2026 Ga. App. LEXIS 222 (Apr. 30, 2026):*

Continue reading
Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on GA: Virtually all-inclusive list of items to be seized wasn’t overbroad

CA4: Dist.Ct. erred in applying search incident to arrest to suppress bag when inventory was inevitable

The District Court erred in applying search incident to defendant’s bag where there was a valid alternative ground of inevitable discovery through inventory when he would be processed into jail. United States v. Allen, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 12443 (4th Cir. Apr. 28, 2026).*

Defendant’s motion papers show no factual dispute on the motion to suppress, so he doesn’t get a hearing. People v. Sampson, 2026 NYLJ LEXIS 730 (N.Y. Co. Apr. 9, 2026).*

Defendant’s pole camera argument is unpreserved. People v. Griffin, 2026 NY Slip Op 02670 (2d Dept. Apr. 29, 2026).*

Officers had reasonable suspicion for this probation search. United States v. Spadt, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94611 (D. Mont. Apr. 29, 2026).*

Posted in Inventory, Pole cameras, Search incident, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA4: Dist.Ct. erred in applying search incident to arrest to suppress bag when inventory was inevitable

OR: Even if original served warrant wasn’t the one returned, it doesn’t warrant suppression

Defendant argues that the return must be the original copy of the warrant issued by the judge per statute. It was a copy. Even if it was a mistake, it was ministerial from which there was no prejudice. State v. Minneci, 349 Or. App. 108 (Apr. 29, 2026).

Plaintiff’s arrest for disorderly was with probable cause under Arkansas law. When he resisted, his take down was reasonable. Ward v. City of Sherwood, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 12101 (8th Cir. Apr. 28, 2026).*

There was reasonable suspicion for the search of defendant’s car under a probation search waiver. State v. Spottswood, 2026 Wisc. App. LEXIS 470 (Apr. 28, 2026).*

A sealed ex parte motion not to be filed or served on government ended up on Lexis seeking information for a Franks challenge. United States v. Silva, No. 2:25-Cr-268 JAM, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93238 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2026).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on OR: Even if original served warrant wasn’t the one returned, it doesn’t warrant suppression

Two on suicide calls as exigency

Defendant’s houseguest called the local suicide hotline, and a patrol officer came by the house, and the guest let him in. The officer smelled marijuana, but didn’t act on it right away because of the suicide call. The entry was based on exigent circumstances. State v. Swanson, 2026 Iowa App. LEXIS 400 (Apr. 29, 2026).

Plaintiff texted his mother-in-law to say that he and his wife committed suicide together. She called the police, and they came to the house and entered. They reentered to get medications for a potential overdose. The entries were valid. Thivener v. Nero, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 12303 (3d Cir. Apr. 29, 2026).

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on Two on suicide calls as exigency

W.D.N.Y.: Civil discovery dispute denies access to other employees’ cell phones as 4A issue

In an employment action against a city, plaintiff sought discovery of messages on cell phones. Making the city seek them raises Fourth Amendment concerns under O’Connor v. Ortega. Reynolds v. City of Rochester, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93293 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 28, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Civil discovery dispute denies access to other employees’ cell phones as 4A issue

Reason: All New Cars Could Have Mandatory Surveillance Tech Unless Congress Stops This Mandate

Reason: All New Cars Could Have Mandatory Surveillance Tech Unless Congress Stops This Mandate by Meagan O’Rourke (“This week, several House Republicans reignited a yearslong debate over a law that federally mandates cars to have impaired driving technology, raising concerns about the expanding surveillance state. The controversy over ‘kill switch’ technology began in 2021, when Congress passed the HALT Drunk Driving Act as part of the 2021 bipartisan infrastructure law. The provision requires that ‘advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology’—which the bill defined as a system that can ‘passively monitor the performance of a driver of a motor vehicle to accurately identify whether that driver may be impaired’ and ‘prevent or limit motor vehicle operation if an impairment is detected’—be installed in new cars. Such systems could involve driver eye tracking, a feature already built into some cars.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Reason: All New Cars Could Have Mandatory Surveillance Tech Unless Congress Stops This Mandate

CA3: In seeking arrest warrants, officers need not present all exculpatory evidence to issuing magistrate unless it’s “conclusive”

Being tried and acquitted of murder, plaintiff sued the police who arrested her. She had an affirmative defense which led to the acquittal. Failure to present conclusive evidence of an affirmative defense to the issuing magistrate would be a probable cause violation. Here, however, there is no clearly established authority for that, and the officer gets qualified immunity. Kendig v. Stolar, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 12170 (3d Cir. Apr. 28, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Neutral and detached magistrate, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA3: In seeking arrest warrants, officers need not present all exculpatory evidence to issuing magistrate unless it’s “conclusive”

D.Idaho: Trial references to SW not barred, but govt limited in what it can say

Defendant’s motion to preclude the government from referring to being in his house on a search warrant is granted in part and denied in part under F.R.E. 403. The government cannot suggest that issuance of a warrant means any judicial officer believes defendant is guilty, and defendant can craft a limiting instruction for trial. United States v. Reyes, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92493 (D. Idaho Apr. 27, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Trial references to SW not barred, but govt limited in what it can say

D.D.C.: PO’s alleged violation of probation regulations doesn’t warrant suppression if a reasonable mistake

Even if GPS monitoring by a Community Supervision Officer under D.C. law violated regulations, a reasonable mistake of law (Heien) overcomes the violation, and it is not suppressed. United States v. White, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92214 (D.D.C. Apr. 27, 2026).

The use of flashlights in a dark room isn’t a Fourth Amendment violation. United States v. McCary, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92257 (E.D. Okla. Mar. 10, 2026).*

22-month-old information in a child pornography was not stale. United States v. Hoffman, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92276 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 27, 2026).*

The government didn’t prove reasonable suspicion for defendant’s traffic stop. “Accordingly, even under the alternative assumption that the initial stop was valid, the Court holds that law enforcement violated the Fourth Amendment by converting the stop into a custodial arrest without probable cause, and that the fruits of that arrest must be suppressed.” United States v. Rizo, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92456 (S.D. Miss. Apr. 27, 2026).*

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on D.D.C.: PO’s alleged violation of probation regulations doesn’t warrant suppression if a reasonable mistake

E.D.N.C.: SW not required to look in def’s jail property bag and retrieve car keys

Inserting a key in a lock to see if it worked wasn’t a search. The key was in his jail property and lawfully taken from there. A warrant wasn’t required to get into his property bag. United States v. Miller, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91369 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 2026).

Defendant’s stop was justified for a paper dealer tag, and that led to consent to search for firearms which led to probable cause to search for drugs. United States v. Jenkins, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63336 (M.D. Ala. Mar. 2, 2026),* adopted, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60469 (M.D. Ala. Mar. 23, 2026).*

Defendant claimed that the search warrant for pharmacy records in a pill mill case was based entirely on a prescription database, but it wasn’t. There were 64 pages of other stuff showing probable cause. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Chaney, 2026 Ky. App. LEXIS 40 (Apr. 24, 2026).*

Texas’s statutory exclusionary rule (Art. 38.21) doesn’t apply in federal court. United States v. Etheredge, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91820 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 24, 2026).

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: SW not required to look in def’s jail property bag and retrieve car keys

D.N.M.: Consent attenuated unreasonable search

Opening a box in defendant’s car was an unreasonable search, and it likely violated the Fourth Amendment. Defendant was later Mirandized and consented. After a thorough discussion of the caselaw, the court finds that the constitutional violation was slight [what about de minimis intrusions still being intrusions] and the court declines to suppress. United States v. Herrera, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91988 (D.N.M. Apr. 27, 2026)* [reasonable people could disagree]:

Continue reading
Posted in Attenuation, Consent | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Consent attenuated unreasonable search

CA9: Boat tied to a dock is a vehicle for automobile exception even if someone lives on it

A boat tied to a dock is subject to the vehicle exception even if somebody lives on it. United States v. Jones, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11866 (9th Cir. Apr. 24, 2026).

Officers don’t have to piecemeal the exigency for a warrantless entry. It’s the totality, which is present here. Eurton v. Thomas, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11868 (6th Cir. Apr. 23, 2026).*

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress that was doomed to fail on all accounts: stop for illegal U-turn, fleeing from vehicle carrying a rifle that was discarded in flight. Lay v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90278 (W.D. Tenn. Apr. 24, 2026).*

Even plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim survives a Heck bar, which it might, it’s barred by limitations. He always knew about the search. Stauch v. Jackson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91261 (S.D. Ala. Apr. 24, 2026).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA9: Boat tied to a dock is a vehicle for automobile exception even if someone lives on it